UPDATE: Trolls and non-supportive
individuals are not welcome on this page. If you do not support the work done
by the Welfare News Service, there is no reason for you to be here. We will be
hardening our stance against these individuals, blocking where necessary, so as
to protect and show solidarity to the vast majority who DO support our
position. Why would someone follow a page they do not support other than to
troll posts.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE ABOVE POST?
I will
start from this stance: oppressors usually
characterise themselves as victims in order to create a narrative to justify
their actions
There were no
troll or abusive posts on WNS page yesterday so why would they suggest there
was?
Yesterday, WNS
decided to publish my first blog and then thought better of it and removed it
after Hazel Quinn came on and said 'oh, don't feed trolls' Well I wasn't a troll, you chose to publish
the article for a short period before removing it. I am pleased you did as over
200 people read it and might now be beginning to wonder why Bernadette Del
Aguila is connected to a telepest phone number and they might also question
where the money from the donate button to a paypal account goes to.
WNS are trying to
create the impression that silly trolls are being naughty and saying things
that are not true. They are trying to disrupt the good work of the page they
say. Who would do that to kind members of the public who have come together to
fight the terrible austerity cuts.
The truth is I have not ever posted on the page but any
member of the public can read it. I do not read it to mess about, I read it to
try and make sense of what is actually going on.
I also thought
WNS was a good page until I saw the organised attack of a man with known mental
health issues by people associated in the top level connected to this group. To
me that was as unprofessional as you would find. No professional organisation would uses such bully boy tactics unless they
were trying very hard to cover up something.
An new narrative is being included. That those supporting George Rolph are encouraing his death. NO AT ALL. Many of us have always tried to encourage George on a different route but he is his own man. These groups were all to happy to support his hunger strike themselves. You have to ask why they suddenly changed their mind. They never said it was because they feared he would die, they said he was a nutcase and made him look like a dangerous man and a woman hater. Georges only crime was that he would not play their game (what ever it is)
Today WNS are still playing victim to trolls. No trolls visited the page. The link to the page was posted by them in a double bluff to make people think it was lies.
